Back to Document AI

Model comparison

Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6 vs Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5

Compare Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6 and Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5 using the same provider-sourced document ai rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 4, 2026

Estimate your cost

Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.

Counts pages, not files. A 10-page PDF counts as 10 pages. The estimate uses the document-processing rate available for each model.

How this estimate works

Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.

Estimate your cost
ModelEstimated total (USD)
Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6Google Cloud$0.10
Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5Google CloudNo reviewed rate

Quick take

Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6

Google Cloud's Gemini-assisted parser for preserving document hierarchy and creating context-rich chunks for enterprise search and RAG.

Best for

  • RAG over reports, manuals, and filings
  • Layout-aware chunks with inherited headings
  • Mixed PDF, presentation, document, and spreadsheet ingestion

Watch out for

Version 1.6 is a release candidate and uses a global Gemini endpoint. Google explicitly says it does not satisfy its normal data-residency standard, even when the request enters through a US or EU location.

Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5

Google Cloud's Gemini-powered Document AI processor for extracting the exact fields and derived values defined in a business schema.

Best for

  • Contracts, invoices, statements, and business forms
  • Schema-driven fields across changing layouts
  • Derived values that are not copied verbatim from one spot

Watch out for

This version is a preview and does not support fine-tuning. Define an evaluation set and human-review rules before trusting extracted fields in legal, financial, or operational workflows.

Compare the published facts

Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6 vs Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Document AIGoogle Gemini Layout Parser 1.6Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5
Price per pageA current provider rate and the exact page or annotation unit it covers.$10 / 1K pages, including initial chunking$30 / 1K pages to 1M · $20 / 1K above
Accepted documentsThe file and document types the listed endpoint is designed to process.PDF, HTML, DOCX, PPTX, XLSX, XLSMPDF and image documents with a custom field schema
What you get backMarkdown, tables, chunks, fields, descriptions, or another machine-readable result.DocumentLayout hierarchy, contextual chunks, table/figure descriptionsNamed entities, nested fields, and derived values
Layout & confidenceWhether the output preserves boxes, hierarchy, labels, reading order, or confidence information.OCR-grounded headings, tables, figures, lists, headers and footersField-level document entities; confidence not promised for v3.5
Language coverageProvider-documented language support without inferring unlisted languages.Not enumerated for this versionNot enumerated for this version
Where it runsDirect API, batch service, private environment, marketplace, or regional cloud route.Google Cloud Document AI; global Gemini endpointGoogle Cloud Document AI; US/EU processing

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6

Google says Document AI customer documents and predictions are not used to train its models. Online documents are processed in memory without disk persistence; batch inputs have a failsafe retention of up to one day.

Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5

Google says Document AI customer documents and predictions are not used to train its models. Online documents are processed in memory without disk persistence; batch inputs have a failsafe retention of up to one day.

Frequently asked questions

Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6 vs Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5 FAQ

What is the main difference between Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6 and Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5?

Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6: Google Cloud's Gemini-assisted parser for preserving document hierarchy and creating context-rich chunks for enterprise search and RAG. Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5: Google Cloud's Gemini-powered Document AI processor for extracting the exact fields and derived values defined in a business schema.

Should I choose Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6 or Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5?

Consider Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6 when your priority is RAG over reports, manuals, and filings. Consider Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5 when your priority is Contracts, invoices, statements, and business forms. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this Google Gemini Layout Parser 1.6 vs Google Document AI Custom Extractor 3.5 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Document AI category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.