BusinessGPT-5.6 readyClaude Fable 5.1 ready

Innovation Strategy Prompt

A detailed prompt template with named context, evidence rules, a clear output contract, and a quality check — built from this original task:

Outline an innovation strategy for my company, focusing on driving creativity and staying ahead of industry trends.

Prompt variables

Add your context

0/6

Fill in what you know. Empty fields stay as editable placeholders in the prompt.

<organization_or_situation>

<decision_question>

<verified_facts_and_baseline_data>

<options_being_considered>

<criteria_and_relative_importance>

<constraints_dependencies_and_deadline>

Live prompt

Your entries update the template instantly.

You are a experienced business analyst who explains tradeoffs clearly and does not invent evidence.

Complete the task below using the supplied context and only the sources you are authorized to use.

<task>
Outline an innovation strategy for my company, focusing on driving creativity and staying ahead of industry trends.
</task>

<context>
Organization or situation: <organization_or_situation>
Question: <decision_question>
Relevant facts: <verified_facts_and_baseline_data>
Options: <options_being_considered>
Decision criteria: <criteria_and_relative_importance>
Constraints: <constraints_dependencies_and_deadline>
</context>

Working rules
1. Clarify the decision and evaluation criteria before comparing options.
2. Trace conclusions back to supplied facts. Mark estimates, assumptions, and missing evidence explicitly.
3. Include second-order effects, operational dependencies, and credible downside cases.
4. Recommend a course of action only after showing the tradeoffs that drive it.

Output contract
1. A direct answer with the recommended option and confidence level.
2. A comparison table using the stated decision criteria.
3. Key assumptions, risks, and information gaps.
4. A practical next-step plan, including what to validate before committing further resources.

Quality check
Before finalizing, verify the result against each criterion below. Fix any gap you can resolve from the supplied context; list anything that still needs human input.
1. The comparison uses consistent criteria across all options.
2. No precise number appears without a source, calculation, or explicit estimate label.
3. The recommendation remains valid under the most plausible downside scenario, or says why it does not.
4. The next step is reversible where uncertainty is still high.

Return the finished deliverable first. Keep private reasoning internal. Do not add a generic introduction.

Review the completed prompt before using it. After the first answer, make one targeted change at a time so you can see what improves the result.

Why this works

Enough structure, without scripting the reasoning

  • It gives the model a decision rubric rather than asking for an open-ended opinion.
  • It requires assumptions and downside cases to stay visible.
  • It ends with a validation step, which is often more valuable than false certainty.

Model notes

GPT-5.6

Use medium reasoning as a practical starting point. The prompt defines the outcome, evidence boundary, constraints, and final answer while leaving the model room to choose an efficient approach.

Claude Fable 5.1

Start with high effort, then test lower levels against your own quality bar. The XML sections, explicit source rules, and output contract match current Claude prompting guidance without asking for visible chain-of-thought.

Guidance checked September 1, 2026.

After the first draft

Continue with one focused follow-up

Keep the original brief in the same conversation, then use the next instruction that matches what you actually need.

1

Critique the innovation strategy above against the quality check. List only material gaps, then provide a corrected version.

2

Create a second version for <alternative_audience_or_scenario>. Preserve verified facts and explain the three most important changes.

3

Turn the result into a 30-day action plan with owners, dependencies, success signals, and a weekly review cadence.

Ground the prompt in your own business

Train Cody on approved company knowledge, then run detailed prompts with answers grounded in the context your team trusts.

Get Started Free