Back to Video generation

Model comparison

Veo 3.1 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5

Compare Veo 3.1 and Grok Imagine Video 1.5 using the same provider-sourced video generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 4, 2026

Estimate your cost

Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.

Example: 8-second, 720p clips with audio. Models that do not support these settings will not receive an estimate.

How this estimate works

Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.

Estimate your cost
ModelEstimated total (USD)
Veo 3.1Google$3.20
Grok Imagine Video 1.5SpaceXAINo reviewed rate

Quick take

Veo 3.1

Google's preview video model for text-, image-, and video-guided generation with native audio and output options up to 4K.

Best for

  • Short cinematic clips with native audio
  • 4K experiments and video extension
  • Google-centric media pipelines

Watch out for

It remains a preview model. Regional person-generation rules, two-day server retention, and resolution/duration constraints need product-level handling.

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

SpaceXAI's current video model for turning text, images, or references into short clips with optional generated speech and sound.

Best for

  • Short sound-on marketing clips
  • Grok-based image and video workflows
  • Reference-guided video experiments

Watch out for

Reference-to-video output is capped at 720p, generated download URLs are temporary, and complex requests can take several minutes to complete.

Compare the published facts

Veo 3.1 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Video generationVeo 3.1Grok Imagine Video 1.5
Generation priceCurrent list price per generated second or the provider's closest billing unit.$0.40/s standard with audio$0.08 480p · $0.14 720p · $0.25 1080p / sec
Clip durationDocumented duration choices or maximum clip length.4, 6, or 8 seconds1–15 seconds
Maximum outputHighest provider-documented output resolution, with relevant constraints.Up to 4K; 1080p/4K require 8s1080p; references capped at 720p
Native audioWhether the endpoint generates synchronized audio with video.YesYes; can be disabled
Input modesSupported text, image, video, reference, or motion inputs.Text, image, or video to videoText, image, or references to video
Generation timeOnly shown when a provider publishes a range; not a Cody benchmark.Official range: 11s–6mTypically up to several minutes

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

Veo 3.1

Google says paid Gemini API content is not used to improve its products. Generated videos are retained on the server for two days and should be downloaded during that window.

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

SpaceXAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for training without explicit permission. Default encrypted retention is 30 days; team-level zero data retention is available with feature tradeoffs.

Frequently asked questions

Veo 3.1 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5 FAQ

What is the main difference between Veo 3.1 and Grok Imagine Video 1.5?

Veo 3.1: Google's preview video model for text-, image-, and video-guided generation with native audio and output options up to 4K. Grok Imagine Video 1.5: SpaceXAI's current video model for turning text, images, or references into short clips with optional generated speech and sound.

Should I choose Veo 3.1 or Grok Imagine Video 1.5?

Consider Veo 3.1 when your priority is Short cinematic clips with native audio. Consider Grok Imagine Video 1.5 when your priority is Short sound-on marketing clips. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this Veo 3.1 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Video generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.