Back to Voice & realtime

Model comparison

GPT-Realtime-2.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

Compare GPT-Realtime-2.1 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview using the same provider-sourced voice & realtime rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 4, 2026

Quick take

GPT-Realtime-2.1

OpenAI's realtime speech-to-speech reasoning model for tool-using voice agents that also need text and image context.

Best for

  • Tool-using customer or employee voice agents
  • Multimodal realtime assistants
  • OpenAI-native agent stacks

Watch out for

There is no published universal latency number, and audio-token costs are hard to compare directly with minute- or character-priced competitors.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

Google's preview audio-to-audio model for low-latency dialogue with multimodal awareness, thinking, search grounding, and function calling.

Best for

  • Multimodal voice assistants
  • Google search-grounded live experiences
  • Low-cost audio experimentation

Watch out for

The model is preview, and paid versus unpaid projects have different data-use terms. Confirm both before capturing sensitive conversations.

Compare the published facts

GPT-Realtime-2.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Voice & realtimeGPT-Realtime-2.1Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview
Price basisToken-, character-, or minute-based price for the listed access route.Audio $32 in · $64 out / 1M tokensAudio $0.005/min in · $0.018/min out
Interaction modeSpeech-to-speech, audio-to-audio, or streamed text-to-speech behavior.Speech-to-speech with text/image contextRealtime audio-to-audio, multimodal input
Published latencyProvider-published measurement with its stated exclusions; not a Cody test.Not publishedNot published
LanguagesProvider-documented language coverage or a clear unpublished marker.Multilingual; exact list not published hereMultilingual; verify current Live API support
Tools & controlNative function calling, reasoning, or speech-control features.Function calling and configurable reasoningFunction calling and search grounding
Context or input limitDocumented token or character limit where it is meaningful.128K input · 32K max output131,072 input · 65,536 output

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

GPT-Realtime-2.1

OpenAI says API content is not used for training by default. Default abuse-monitoring logs may be retained up to 30 days, with additional controls available to qualifying organizations.

Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview

Google says paid Gemini API content is not used to improve its products; unpaid service data generally can be. Confirm billing status and current terms before sending sensitive conversations.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-Realtime-2.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview FAQ

What is the main difference between GPT-Realtime-2.1 and Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview?

GPT-Realtime-2.1: OpenAI's realtime speech-to-speech reasoning model for tool-using voice agents that also need text and image context. Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview: Google's preview audio-to-audio model for low-latency dialogue with multimodal awareness, thinking, search grounding, and function calling.

Should I choose GPT-Realtime-2.1 or Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview?

Consider GPT-Realtime-2.1 when your priority is Tool-using customer or employee voice agents. Consider Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview when your priority is Multimodal voice assistants. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this GPT-Realtime-2.1 vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Live Preview comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Voice & realtime category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.