Back to Text & reasoning

Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Fable 5

Compare GPT-5.6 Terra and Claude Fable 5 using the same provider-sourced text & reasoning rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 14, 2026

Estimate your cost

Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.

Example: 6,000 input tokens for 10 pages, plus a 500-token summary. Page lengths vary; adjust the numbers below.

One run sends your input to the model once and receives an answer. Tokens are pieces of text: input is what you send, output is the answer you receive.

Advanced options
How this estimate works

Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.

Estimate your cost
ModelEstimated total (USD)
GPT-5.6 TerraOpenAI$0.018
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$0.085

Quick take

GPT-5.6 Terra

A lower-cost GPT-5.6 option for coding, analysis and assistants that use tools.

Best for

  • Coding assistants
  • Everyday analysis

Watch out for

Long context, reasoning and tool calls can cost more than the headline token rate.

Claude Fable 5

The original Fable model for complex coding and multi-step work, retained for existing integrations.

Best for

  • Complex coding
  • Migration evaluations

Watch out for

Check the newer Fable 5.1 and the mandatory retention requirements before starting a new project.

Compare the published facts

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Fable 5

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Text & reasoningGPT-5.6 TerraClaude Fable 5
Context windowMaximum combined prompt and working context documented by the provider.1.05M tokens1M tokens
Maximum outputProvider-published response limit, where available.128K tokens128K tokens
Knowledge cutoffLatest reliable knowledge date explicitly published by the model provider. Search and connected tools can retrieve newer information but do not change the model's built-in cutoff.February 16, 2026January 2026
Input priceCurrent standard list price per million input tokens unless noted.$2 / 1M$10 / 1M
Output priceCurrent standard list price per million output tokens unless noted.$12 / 1M$50 / 1M
InputsMedia types accepted by the listed model endpoint.Text, imageText, image
Tools & agentsSelected native tools and agent-building capabilities, not an exhaustive list.Functions, web/file search, code, computer, MCPTool use, agents, vision, coding workflows

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

GPT-5.6 Terra

OpenAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for model training by default. Default abuse-monitoring logs may be retained for up to 30 days; qualifying organizations can request other controls.

Provider and API links

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 requires 30-day retention unless Anthropic authorizes an exception. API data is not used for training without express permission.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Fable 5 FAQ

What is the main difference between GPT-5.6 Terra and Claude Fable 5?

GPT-5.6 Terra: A lower-cost GPT-5.6 option for coding, analysis and assistants that use tools. Claude Fable 5: The original Fable model for complex coding and multi-step work, retained for existing integrations.

Should I choose GPT-5.6 Terra or Claude Fable 5?

Consider GPT-5.6 Terra when your priority is Coding assistants. Consider Claude Fable 5 when your priority is Complex coding. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this GPT-5.6 Terra vs Claude Fable 5 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Text & reasoning category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.