Back to Video generation
Model comparison
Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2.3 Pro
Compare Veo 3.1 Fast and LTX-2.3 Pro using the same provider-sourced video generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Estimate your cost
Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.
Example: 8-second, 720p clips with audio. Models that do not support these settings will not receive an estimate.
How this estimate works
Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.
| Model | Access | Estimated total (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Veo 3.1 FastGoogle | $0.80 | |
| LTX-2.3 ProLightricks | Lightricks | No reviewed rate |
Quick take
Veo 3.1 Fast
Google's lower-cost Veo 3.1 variant for quickly creating short video clips with native audio and output options up to 4K.
Best for
- Rapid ad and social-video variations
- Short clips that need generated audio
- Teams seeking a lower-cost route into Veo
Watch out for
Fast does not mean instant: Google says video requests can still take from seconds to several minutes at peak times. Generated files are retained for two days, and feature combinations vary by endpoint.
LTX-2.3 Pro
LTX's mature full-workflow video model for generation plus Retake, Extend, Reframe, native audio, and first-to-last-frame control.
Best for
- Video pipelines that need generation and editing
- First-to-last-frame interpolation
- Retake, Extend, and Reframe workflows
Watch out for
Generation, audio-to-video, and editing endpoints do not all share one rate or limit. Pick the exact route, resolution, frame rate, and duration before comparing it with 2.5 Fast or Pro.
Compare the published facts
Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2.3 Pro
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| Video generation | Veo 3.1 Fast | LTX-2.3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Generation priceCurrent list price per generated second or the provider's closest billing unit. | $0.10 720p · $0.12 1080p · $0.30 4K / sec | $0.04/s 720p to $0.32/s 4K for text/image generation |
| Clip durationDocumented duration choices or maximum clip length. | 4, 6, or 8 seconds | Up to 20 seconds depending on route and resolution |
| Maximum outputHighest provider-documented output resolution, with relevant constraints. | 4K at 8 seconds | 4K |
| Native audioWhether the endpoint generates synchronized audio with video. | Yes, always on | Yes on Pro |
| Input modesSupported text, image, video, reference, or motion inputs. | Text, image, or video to video | Text, image, audio; first/last frame; Retake, Extend, Reframe |
| Generation timeOnly shown when a provider publishes a range; not a Cody benchmark. | 11 seconds–6 minutes at peak | Not published |
How to choose
Compare the job, not the hype.
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Veo 3.1 Fast
Google's paid Gemini API terms say prompts and responses are not used to improve its products. Generated Veo videos are stored on the server for two days and must be downloaded to keep them.
Provider and API links
LTX-2.3 Pro
The reviewed public LTX model and pricing guides do not state one complete endpoint-specific retention or training-use commitment. Verify current account and enterprise terms for sensitive media.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2.3 Pro FAQ
What is the main difference between Veo 3.1 Fast and LTX-2.3 Pro?
Veo 3.1 Fast: Google's lower-cost Veo 3.1 variant for quickly creating short video clips with native audio and output options up to 4K. LTX-2.3 Pro: LTX's mature full-workflow video model for generation plus Retake, Extend, Reframe, native audio, and first-to-last-frame control.
Should I choose Veo 3.1 Fast or LTX-2.3 Pro?
Consider Veo 3.1 Fast when your priority is Rapid ad and social-video variations. Consider LTX-2.3 Pro when your priority is Video pipelines that need generation and editing. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
Is this Veo 3.1 Fast vs LTX-2.3 Pro comparison based on Cody benchmarks?
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Video generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.