Back to Video generation

Model comparison

Sora 2 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5

Compare Sora 2 and Grok Imagine Video 1.5 using the same provider-sourced video generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 4, 2026

Estimate your cost

Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.

Example: 8-second, 720p clips with audio. Models that do not support these settings will not receive an estimate.

How this estimate works

Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.

Estimate your cost
ModelEstimated total (USD)
Grok Imagine Video 1.5SpaceXAINo reviewed rate
Sora 2OpenAINo reviewed rate

Quick take

Sora 2

OpenAI's legacy synced-audio video model for short text- or image-guided clips—still documented, but approaching a permanent API shutdown.

Best for

  • Evaluating an existing Sora integration
  • Short synced-audio experiments before shutdown
  • Planning a migration to another video provider

Watch out for

The API shutdown is imminent. Treat every new dependency on Sora 2 as temporary and export anything you need to keep.

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

SpaceXAI's current video model for turning text, images, or references into short clips with optional generated speech and sound.

Best for

  • Short sound-on marketing clips
  • Grok-based image and video workflows
  • Reference-guided video experiments

Watch out for

Reference-to-video output is capped at 720p, generated download URLs are temporary, and complex requests can take several minutes to complete.

Compare the published facts

Sora 2 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Video generationSora 2Grok Imagine Video 1.5
Generation priceCurrent list price per generated second or the provider's closest billing unit.$0.10 / generated second$0.08 480p · $0.14 720p · $0.25 1080p / sec
Clip durationDocumented duration choices or maximum clip length.4, 8, or 12 seconds1–15 seconds
Maximum outputHighest provider-documented output resolution, with relevant constraints.720×1280 or 1280×7201080p; references capped at 720p
Native audioWhether the endpoint generates synchronized audio with video.Yes, synced audioYes; can be disabled
Input modesSupported text, image, video, reference, or motion inputs.Text or image to videoText, image, or references to video
Generation timeOnly shown when a provider publishes a range; not a Cody benchmark.Not publishedTypically up to several minutes

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

Sora 2

OpenAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for training by default. Standard abuse-monitoring and feature-specific storage controls apply until the service shuts down.

Grok Imagine Video 1.5

SpaceXAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for training without explicit permission. Default encrypted retention is 30 days; team-level zero data retention is available with feature tradeoffs.

Frequently asked questions

Sora 2 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5 FAQ

What is the main difference between Sora 2 and Grok Imagine Video 1.5?

Sora 2: OpenAI's legacy synced-audio video model for short text- or image-guided clips—still documented, but approaching a permanent API shutdown. Grok Imagine Video 1.5: SpaceXAI's current video model for turning text, images, or references into short clips with optional generated speech and sound.

Should I choose Sora 2 or Grok Imagine Video 1.5?

Consider Sora 2 when your priority is Evaluating an existing Sora integration. Consider Grok Imagine Video 1.5 when your priority is Short sound-on marketing clips. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this Sora 2 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Video generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.