Back to World models
Model comparison
Oasis 3 vs Odyssey-2 Max
Compare Oasis 3 and Odyssey-2 Max using the same provider-sourced world models rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Quick take
Oasis 3
Decart's action-conditioned world model for physical-AI training, generating synchronized, controllable simulation views in real time.
Best for
- Autonomous-vehicle edge-case simulation
- Closed-loop physical-AI training
- Teams exploring generated alternatives to fixed simulators
Watch out for
Self-serve pricing, broad country coverage, retention, and training-use terms are not published on the model page; obtain them contractually.
Odyssey-2 Max
Odyssey's largest general world model, focused on real-time next-state simulation, physical accuracy, open-ended futures, and longer interactive rollouts.
Best for
- Frontier robotics and simulation partnerships
- Interactive systems research
- Teams that can participate in a private beta
Watch out for
The public announcement does not provide exact Max resolution, frame rate, API price, retention, or residency details.
Compare the published facts
Oasis 3 vs Odyssey-2 Max
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| World models | Oasis 3 | Odyssey-2 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Price basisPublic API cost where available; research and private-beta models may not publish one. | Not publicly listed | Not published |
| Access stagePublic API, research experiment, partner onboarding, or private beta. | API / partner access | Private beta |
| What it createsThe kind of interactive environment or embodied experience produced. | Action-conditioned physical-AI simulator | General-purpose next-state world simulation |
| InteractionPublished frame rate, latency, or realtime behavior with its original basis. | 22 fps; under 200ms end-to-end claim | Realtime; exact fps not published |
| Visual outputProvider-published resolution or output format where available. | 512×768×3 synchronized views | Not published |
| API accessWhether developers can integrate the model today and under what access model. | Yes, onboarding may be required | Partner/private beta |
How to choose
Compare the job, not the hype.
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Oasis 3
The model page does not state a complete API training-use or retention policy. Physical-AI teams should obtain contractual data-handling terms before contributing proprietary scenarios or fleet data.
Provider and API links
Odyssey-2 Max
No public self-serve API data policy is attached to the private-beta announcement. Request retention, training-use, security, and residency terms during partner diligence.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Oasis 3 vs Odyssey-2 Max FAQ
What is the main difference between Oasis 3 and Odyssey-2 Max?
Oasis 3: Decart's action-conditioned world model for physical-AI training, generating synchronized, controllable simulation views in real time. Odyssey-2 Max: Odyssey's largest general world model, focused on real-time next-state simulation, physical accuracy, open-ended futures, and longer interactive rollouts.
Should I choose Oasis 3 or Odyssey-2 Max?
Consider Oasis 3 when your priority is Autonomous-vehicle edge-case simulation. Consider Odyssey-2 Max when your priority is Frontier robotics and simulation partnerships. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
Is this Oasis 3 vs Odyssey-2 Max comparison based on Cody benchmarks?
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the World models category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.