Model comparison
Midjourney V8.2 vs Reve 2.1
Compare Midjourney V8.2 and Reve 2.1 using the same provider-sourced image generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Model comparison
Compare Midjourney V8.2 and Reve 2.1 using the same provider-sourced image generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.
Example output: square 1,024 × 1,024 images. Prices depend on supported resolution and quality; edits and retries can cost extra.
Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.
| Model | Access | Estimated total (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Midjourney V8.2Midjourney | Midjourney | No reviewed rate |
| Reve 2.1Reve | Reve | No reviewed rate |
Quick take
Midjourney's current default image model for highly polished, style-led creative work, with stronger personalization and a new reference-based Edit Model.
There is no general public API. Creations are open by default, Stealth requires a Pro or Mega plan, and Midjourney says user prompts and images can be used for training.
A typography-aware image model for creating and editing polished visuals, now available through Reve's creative product rather than its discontinued direct API.
The original Reve API is closed. Do not copy its former price or specifications onto a third-party endpoint, and check the product plan's model-improvement opt-out before using confidential brand assets.
Compare the published facts
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| Image generation | Midjourney V8.2 | Reve 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Typical price basisA representative current provider price with its quality or resolution basis. | From $10/month; Stealth from $60/month | Free, $7.99 Lite, or $19.99 Pro subscription |
| Maximum outputMaximum documented resolution or pixel area for the listed route. | 2048×2048 at 1:1 in HD | Up to native 4K / 16MP at launch |
| Core tasksWhether the model supports generation, editing, or both. | Generation, variations, and Edit Model | Generation, editing, layout, and visual references |
| Reference imagesHow the model can use images to guide or edit an output. | Up to 4 through the V8 Edit Model | Image references and editing in the Reve product |
| Text & layoutProvider-documented positioning for typography and structured composition. | Improved text and prompt adherence in the V8 family | Designed for typography, layout, and prompt adherence |
| API accessDirect and notable third-party routes included in this guide. | Website and Discord; no general public API | Original direct API closed; current access is the Reve product |
How to choose
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Midjourney is open by default unless eligible users enable Stealth mode. Its public training summary says prompts, images, and preference data from user interactions are used in model training, so do not assume API-style no-training terms.
Provider and API links
Reve says Free-plan content may be used for model improvement by default. Lite and Pro customers can opt out; verify the live account control before using confidential assets.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Midjourney V8.2: Midjourney's current default image model for highly polished, style-led creative work, with stronger personalization and a new reference-based Edit Model. Reve 2.1: A typography-aware image model for creating and editing polished visuals, now available through Reve's creative product rather than its discontinued direct API.
Consider Midjourney V8.2 when your priority is Art direction and visual exploration. Consider Reve 2.1 when your priority is Images that include typography or deliberate layout. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Image generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.