Model comparison
Grok Imagine Image 2.0 vs Reve 2.1
Compare Grok Imagine Image 2.0 and Reve 2.1 using the same provider-sourced image generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Model comparison
Compare Grok Imagine Image 2.0 and Reve 2.1 using the same provider-sourced image generation rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Facts checked September 4, 2026
Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.
Example output: square 1,024 × 1,024 images. Prices depend on supported resolution and quality; edits and retries can cost extra.
Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.
| Model | Access | Estimated total (USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Grok Imagine Image 2.0SpaceXAI | SpaceXAI | $0.60 |
| Reve 2.1Reve | Reve | No reviewed rate |
Quick take
SpaceXAI's current image model for creating and editing practical visuals, with an emphasis on following detailed instructions, typography, and consistent references.
The $0.04 headline is the lowest output setting. Higher resolution, Medium quality, and source images increase the cost of each request.
A typography-aware image model for creating and editing polished visuals, now available through Reve's creative product rather than its discontinued direct API.
The original Reve API is closed. Do not copy its former price or specifications onto a third-party endpoint, and check the product plan's model-improvement opt-out before using confidential brand assets.
Compare the published facts
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| Image generation | Grok Imagine Image 2.0 | Reve 2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Typical price basisA representative current provider price with its quality or resolution basis. | $0.04–$0.08 / output image | Free, $7.99 Lite, or $19.99 Pro subscription |
| Maximum outputMaximum documented resolution or pixel area for the listed route. | 1K or 2K | Up to native 4K / 16MP at launch |
| Core tasksWhether the model supports generation, editing, or both. | Generation and editing | Generation, editing, layout, and visual references |
| Reference imagesHow the model can use images to guide or edit an output. | Up to 5 source images | Image references and editing in the Reve product |
| Text & layoutProvider-documented positioning for typography and structured composition. | Typography and structured-layout focus | Designed for typography, layout, and prompt adherence |
| API accessDirect and notable third-party routes included in this guide. | SpaceXAI Imagine API | Original direct API closed; current access is the Reve product |
How to choose
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
SpaceXAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for training without explicit permission. Default encrypted retention is 30 days; team-level zero data retention is available with feature tradeoffs.
Provider and API links
Reve says Free-plan content may be used for model improvement by default. Lite and Pro customers can opt out; verify the live account control before using confidential assets.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Grok Imagine Image 2.0: SpaceXAI's current image model for creating and editing practical visuals, with an emphasis on following detailed instructions, typography, and consistent references. Reve 2.1: A typography-aware image model for creating and editing polished visuals, now available through Reve's creative product rather than its discontinued direct API.
Consider Grok Imagine Image 2.0 when your priority is Marketing visuals with text and layout. Consider Reve 2.1 when your priority is Images that include typography or deliberate layout. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Image generation category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.