Back to Voice & realtime

Model comparison

GPT-Live 1 vs GPT-Realtime-2.1

Compare GPT-Live 1 and GPT-Realtime-2.1 using the same provider-sourced voice & realtime rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 11, 2026

Quick take

GPT-Live 1

OpenAI's full-duplex voice frontend for natural conversation that delegates deeper reasoning and actions to a separate backend agent.

Best for

  • Natural customer-service and scheduling calls
  • Voice interfaces that must keep talking while work runs
  • Teams that want to choose or operate the backend agent

Watch out for

Speech interruption does not automatically cancel backend work. Your application still owns permissions, confirmations, cancellation, durable task state, result validation, and playback safeguards.

GPT-Realtime-2.1

OpenAI's realtime speech-to-speech reasoning model for tool-using voice agents that also need text and image context.

Best for

  • Tool-using customer or employee voice agents
  • Multimodal realtime assistants
  • OpenAI-native agent stacks

Watch out for

There is no published universal latency number, and audio-token costs are hard to compare directly with minute- or character-priced competitors.

Compare the published facts

GPT-Live 1 vs GPT-Realtime-2.1

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Voice & realtimeGPT-Live 1GPT-Realtime-2.1
Price basisToken-, character-, or minute-based price for the listed access route.$0.05 / voice minute + backend usageAudio $32 in · $64 out / 1M tokens
Interaction modeSpeech-to-speech, audio-to-audio, or streamed text-to-speech behavior.Full-duplex voice frontend with delegated backendSpeech-to-speech with text/image context
Published latencyProvider-published measurement with its stated exclusions; not a Cody test.Not publishedNot published
LanguagesProvider-documented language coverage or a clear unpublished marker.Multiple accents, dialects, and languages; exact list not publishedMultilingual; exact list not published here
Tools & controlNative function calling, reasoning, or speech-control features.Responses or client delegation to backend agents and toolsFunction calling and configurable reasoning
Context or input limitDocumented token or character limit where it is meaningful.Not published128K input · 32K max output

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

GPT-Live 1

OpenAI says API content is not used for training by default. Default abuse-monitoring logs may be retained up to 30 days, with additional controls available to qualifying organizations.

GPT-Realtime-2.1

OpenAI says API content is not used for training by default. Default abuse-monitoring logs may be retained up to 30 days, with additional controls available to qualifying organizations.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-Live 1 vs GPT-Realtime-2.1 FAQ

What is the main difference between GPT-Live 1 and GPT-Realtime-2.1?

GPT-Live 1: OpenAI's full-duplex voice frontend for natural conversation that delegates deeper reasoning and actions to a separate backend agent. GPT-Realtime-2.1: OpenAI's realtime speech-to-speech reasoning model for tool-using voice agents that also need text and image context.

Should I choose GPT-Live 1 or GPT-Realtime-2.1?

Consider GPT-Live 1 when your priority is Natural customer-service and scheduling calls. Consider GPT-Realtime-2.1 when your priority is Tool-using customer or employee voice agents. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this GPT-Live 1 vs GPT-Realtime-2.1 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Voice & realtime category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.