Back to Text & reasoning

Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna and DeepSeek-V4-Flash using the same provider-sourced text & reasoning rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 14, 2026

Estimate your cost

Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.

Example: 6,000 input tokens for 10 pages, plus a 500-token summary. Page lengths vary; adjust the numbers below.

One run sends your input to the model once and receives an answer. Tokens are pieces of text: input is what you send, output is the answer you receive.

Advanced options
How this estimate works

Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.

Estimate your cost
ModelEstimated total (USD)
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI$0.0018
DeepSeek-V4-FlashDeepSeekNo reviewed rate

Quick take

GPT-5.6 Luna

The budget GPT-5.6 tier for processing many short, repeatable tasks.

Best for

  • Data extraction
  • Request routing

Watch out for

Low token prices do not guarantee a low task cost if the model needs retries or extensive reasoning.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

DeepSeek's lower-cost V4 model for high-volume reasoning, coding, agents, and million-token text workloads.

Best for

  • Cost-efficient coding and agent workloads
  • Large-context text analysis
  • High-concurrency applications using familiar API formats

Watch out for

Flash's knowledge cutoff and universal latency are not published. Do not confuse it with Flash-Vision-Exp, and verify peak pricing, cache behavior, output budgets, jurisdiction, and data handling.

Compare the published facts

GPT-5.6 Luna vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Text & reasoningGPT-5.6 LunaDeepSeek-V4-Flash
Context windowMaximum combined prompt and working context documented by the provider.1.05M tokens1M tokens
Maximum outputProvider-published response limit, where available.128K tokensUp to 384K tokens
Knowledge cutoffLatest reliable knowledge date explicitly published by the model provider. Search and connected tools can retrieve newer information but do not change the model's built-in cutoff.February 16, 2026Not published
Input priceCurrent standard list price per million input tokens unless noted.$0.2 / 1M$0.44 / 1M peak uncached; $0.22 off-peak
Output priceCurrent standard list price per million output tokens unless noted.$1.2 / 1M$1.32 / 1M peak; $0.66 off-peak
InputsMedia types accepted by the listed model endpoint.Text, imageText; separate Flash-Vision-Exp accepts images
Tools & agentsSelected native tools and agent-building capabilities, not an exhaustive list.Functions, web/file search, code, computer, MCPTools, JSON output, Responses API, thinking effort, FIM beta

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for model training by default. Default abuse-monitoring logs may be retained for up to 30 days; qualifying organizations can request other controls.

Provider and API links

DeepSeek-V4-Flash

DeepSeek documents its Responses API as stateless and says responses and conversations are not stored by that endpoint. This is not a complete account-wide retention or training-use promise; review current platform terms and automatic cache behavior for sensitive data.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-5.6 Luna vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash FAQ

What is the main difference between GPT-5.6 Luna and DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

GPT-5.6 Luna: The budget GPT-5.6 tier for processing many short, repeatable tasks. DeepSeek-V4-Flash: DeepSeek's lower-cost V4 model for high-volume reasoning, coding, agents, and million-token text workloads.

Should I choose GPT-5.6 Luna or DeepSeek-V4-Flash?

Consider GPT-5.6 Luna when your priority is Data extraction. Consider DeepSeek-V4-Flash when your priority is Cost-efficient coding and agent workloads. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this GPT-5.6 Luna vs DeepSeek-V4-Flash comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Text & reasoning category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.