Back to Text & reasoning

Model comparison

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Celeris-1 Magnus

Compare GPT-5.6 Luna and Celeris-1 Magnus using the same provider-sourced text & reasoning rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 14, 2026

Estimate your cost

Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.

Example: 6,000 input tokens for 10 pages, plus a 500-token summary. Page lengths vary; adjust the numbers below.

One run sends your input to the model once and receives an answer. Tokens are pieces of text: input is what you send, output is the answer you receive.

Advanced options
How this estimate works

Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.

Estimate your cost
ModelEstimated total (USD)
GPT-5.6 LunaOpenAI$0.0018
Celeris-1 MagnusCelerisNo reviewed rate

Quick take

GPT-5.6 Luna

The budget GPT-5.6 tier for processing many short, repeatable tasks.

Best for

  • Data extraction
  • Request routing

Watch out for

Low token prices do not guarantee a low task cost if the model needs retries or extensive reasoning.

Celeris-1 Magnus

Celeris' agent-focused diffusion language model for fast reasoning, tool loops, structured actions, and OpenAI-compatible integration.

Best for

  • Low-latency tool-using agents
  • Structured extraction and action workflows
  • Teams migrating an OpenAI-compatible client

Watch out for

The public price page labels Celeris-1 rather than Magnus, and the service remains early. Confirm Magnus billing, capacity, support, data retention, and a production SLA directly.

Compare the published facts

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Celeris-1 Magnus

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Text & reasoningGPT-5.6 LunaCeleris-1 Magnus
Context windowMaximum combined prompt and working context documented by the provider.1.05M tokens131,072 tokens combined
Maximum outputProvider-published response limit, where available.128K tokensAny positive limit within the combined context
Knowledge cutoffLatest reliable knowledge date explicitly published by the model provider. Search and connected tools can retrieve newer information but do not change the model's built-in cutoff.February 16, 2026Not published
Input priceCurrent standard list price per million input tokens unless noted.$0.2 / 1M$0.20 / 1M listed family rate; verify Magnus
Output priceCurrent standard list price per million output tokens unless noted.$1.2 / 1M$0.70 / 1M listed family rate; verify Magnus
InputsMedia types accepted by the listed model endpoint.Text, imageText; image content parts supported by the API
Tools & agentsSelected native tools and agent-building capabilities, not an exhaustive list.Functions, web/file search, code, computer, MCPTools, JSON schema, reasoning low/medium/xhigh

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

GPT-5.6 Luna

OpenAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for model training by default. Default abuse-monitoring logs may be retained for up to 30 days; qualifying organizations can request other controls.

Provider and API links

Celeris-1 Magnus

Celeris says API inputs and outputs are processed to provide the service and monitor abuse and reliability. Its public notice does not give one fixed content-retention period or no-training promise; enterprise VPC options are available.

Frequently asked questions

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Celeris-1 Magnus FAQ

What is the main difference between GPT-5.6 Luna and Celeris-1 Magnus?

GPT-5.6 Luna: The budget GPT-5.6 tier for processing many short, repeatable tasks. Celeris-1 Magnus: Celeris' agent-focused diffusion language model for fast reasoning, tool loops, structured actions, and OpenAI-compatible integration.

Should I choose GPT-5.6 Luna or Celeris-1 Magnus?

Consider GPT-5.6 Luna when your priority is Data extraction. Consider Celeris-1 Magnus when your priority is Low-latency tool-using agents. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this GPT-5.6 Luna vs Celeris-1 Magnus comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Text & reasoning category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.