Back to Voice & realtime
Model comparison
Gemini 3.8 Live vs Eleven v3 Conversational
Compare Gemini 3.8 Live and Eleven v3 Conversational using the same provider-sourced voice & realtime rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.
Quick take
Gemini 3.8 Live
Google's real-time voice model for responsive conversations with audio, text and visual context.
Best for
- Conversational customer support
- Voice assistants with camera context
- Everyday tool-using voice agents
Watch out for
Audio input and output are charged separately, not as one flat call-minute price. Text, visual context, thinking and search can add to the bill.
Eleven v3 Conversational
ElevenLabs' expressive realtime text-to-speech model for natural dialogue, emotional delivery, audio tags, and more than 70 languages.
Best for
- Expressive support and assistant voices
- Multilingual interactive characters
- Agent stacks that already supply reasoning and tools
Watch out for
It is not a complete speech-to-speech agent by itself. End-to-end latency also includes transcription, LLM response time, transport, and playback.
Compare the published facts
Gemini 3.8 Live vs Eleven v3 Conversational
Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.
| Voice & realtime | Gemini 3.8 Live | Eleven v3 Conversational |
|---|---|---|
| Price basisToken-, character-, or minute-based price for the listed access route. | Audio $0.005/min in · $0.018/min out | $0.05 / 1K characters |
| Interaction modeSpeech-to-speech, audio-to-audio, or streamed text-to-speech behavior. | Speech-to-speech with visual input and interleaved reasoning | Realtime text-to-speech / text-to-dialogue |
| Published latencyProvider-published measurement with its stated exclusions; not a Cody test. | Not published | ~280ms, excluding app/network |
| LanguagesProvider-documented language coverage or a clear unpublished marker. | 97 languages (Google launch claim) | 70+ languages |
| Tools & controlNative function calling, reasoning, or speech-control features. | Functions (async by default), search grounding | Audio tags; orchestration handled by your agent stack |
| Context or input limitDocumented token or character limit where it is meaningful. | 131,072 input · 65,536 output | 5K-character guidance for v3 family; verify endpoint |
How to choose
Compare the job, not the hype.
Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.
Gemini 3.8 Live
Google says paid Gemini API prompts and responses are not used to improve its products. Unpaid-service content generally may be used, with different treatment for EEA, UK, and Swiss users; check the current terms for your account and region.
Provider and API links
Eleven v3 Conversational
ElevenLabs says enterprise customer data is not used for training by default. Other users can opt out of model improvement; enterprise zero-retention and regional environments are available with plan-specific limits.
Provider and API links
Frequently asked questions
Gemini 3.8 Live vs Eleven v3 Conversational FAQ
What is the main difference between Gemini 3.8 Live and Eleven v3 Conversational?
Gemini 3.8 Live: Google's real-time voice model for responsive conversations with audio, text and visual context. Eleven v3 Conversational: ElevenLabs' expressive realtime text-to-speech model for natural dialogue, emotional delivery, audio tags, and more than 70 languages.
Should I choose Gemini 3.8 Live or Eleven v3 Conversational?
Consider Gemini 3.8 Live when your priority is Conversational customer support. Consider Eleven v3 Conversational when your priority is Expressive support and assistant voices. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.
Is this Gemini 3.8 Live vs Eleven v3 Conversational comparison based on Cody benchmarks?
No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Voice & realtime category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.