Back to Reranking & retrieval

Model comparison

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast vs Voyage Rerank 3

Compare Cohere Rerank 4 Fast and Voyage Rerank 3 using the same provider-sourced reranking & retrieval rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 4, 2026

Quick take

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast

Cohere's lower-latency Rerank 4 option for high-volume search, recommendations, and RAG retrieval.

Best for

  • High-throughput product search
  • Latency-sensitive RAG applications
  • Teams A/B testing speed and retrieval quality

Watch out for

Fast is a relative product tier, not a latency guarantee. Measure it with your document lengths, region, candidate count, and traffic pattern.

Voyage Rerank 3

Voyage AI's quality-focused preview reranker, billed by all query and candidate tokens processed in each request.

Best for

  • Teams already using Voyage embeddings
  • Token-metered retrieval pipelines
  • Evaluating a new quality-focused reranker

Watch out for

Treat it as a preview and confirm candidate caps, language behavior, retention, regional processing, and production support directly before launch.

Compare the published facts

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast vs Voyage Rerank 3

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Reranking & retrievalCohere Rerank 4 FastVoyage Rerank 3
Price basisThe provider's billing unit, with the document or token assumptions needed to compare it fairly.$2 / 1K searches; up to 100 docs per unit$0.05 / 1M processed tokens
Text capacityHow much query and candidate text the model can consider in one scoring pass.32,768 tokens per query-document pass32,000 tokens
Candidates per requestThe maximum number of possible results accepted in one request, when the provider publishes it.Up to 10,000 documents per requestNot published for the Rerank 3 preview
Language coveragePublished multilingual support; an exact count is shown only when the provider gives one.Multilingual; exact count not publishedNot yet detailed for the preview
Structured dataWhether the model is documented for JSON, tables, XML, or other data beyond normal prose.Text and semi-structured JSONText candidates; structured-data support not stated
Where it runsHosted API, cloud marketplace, private deployment, or self-hosted weights.Cohere API; enterprise private and cloud optionsVoyage hosted API and SDKs

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast

Cohere enterprise customers can opt out of training; SaaS prompts and generations are generally deleted after 30 days. Approved zero-data-retention accounts and private or third-party deployments offer stronger controls.

Voyage Rerank 3

The reviewed Rerank 3 and pricing documentation does not publish a complete prompt-retention or model-training commitment. Obtain current data-processing terms before sending private retrieval candidates.

Frequently asked questions

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast vs Voyage Rerank 3 FAQ

What is the main difference between Cohere Rerank 4 Fast and Voyage Rerank 3?

Cohere Rerank 4 Fast: Cohere's lower-latency Rerank 4 option for high-volume search, recommendations, and RAG retrieval. Voyage Rerank 3: Voyage AI's quality-focused preview reranker, billed by all query and candidate tokens processed in each request.

Should I choose Cohere Rerank 4 Fast or Voyage Rerank 3?

Consider Cohere Rerank 4 Fast when your priority is High-throughput product search. Consider Voyage Rerank 3 when your priority is Teams already using Voyage embeddings. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this Cohere Rerank 4 Fast vs Voyage Rerank 3 comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Reranking & retrieval category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.