Back to Text & reasoning

Model comparison

Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta

Compare Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta using the same provider-sourced text & reasoning rubric. No mystery score and no invented benchmark ranking.

Facts checked September 14, 2026

Estimate your cost

Set your usage. Your estimate updates as you type.

Example: 6,000 input tokens for 10 pages, plus a 500-token summary. Page lengths vary; adjust the numbers below.

One run sends your input to the model once and receives an answer. Tokens are pieces of text: input is what you send, output is the answer you receive.

Advanced options
How this estimate works

Estimates exclude taxes, tools, cache storage/writes, free allowances and custom discounts. Image estimates cover output only, not prompt or reference-image charges. Quality modes differ by model. Unlisted settings are not treated as free.

Estimate your cost
ModelEstimated total (USD)
Claude Fable 5Anthropic$0.085
Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent BetaSpaceXAINo reviewed rate

Quick take

Claude Fable 5

The original Fable model for complex coding and multi-step work, retained for existing integrations.

Best for

  • Complex coding
  • Migration evaluations

Watch out for

Check the newer Fable 5.1 and the mandatory retention requirements before starting a new project.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta

A specialist Grok model that sends several AI agents to investigate a difficult question in parallel, then combines their work into one researched answer.

Best for

  • Deep research with several lines of inquiry
  • Source gathering and cross-checking
  • Complex questions that benefit from parallel analysis

Watch out for

This is a beta product, not the newest general-purpose Grok. Its interface may change, and built-in searches or code runs can add cost beyond the headline token price.

Compare the published facts

Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta

Values use each provider's own published units and limits. A blank means the provider did not publish a directly comparable value in the sources reviewed.

Text & reasoningClaude Fable 5Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta
Context windowMaximum combined prompt and working context documented by the provider.1M tokens1,000,000 tokens
Maximum outputProvider-published response limit, where available.128K tokensNot published
Knowledge cutoffLatest reliable knowledge date explicitly published by the model provider. Search and connected tools can retrieve newer information but do not change the model's built-in cutoff.January 2026Not published
Input priceCurrent standard list price per million input tokens unless noted.$10 / 1M$1.25 / 1M
Output priceCurrent standard list price per million output tokens unless noted.$50 / 1M$2.50 / 1M
InputsMedia types accepted by the listed model endpoint.Text, imageText, image
Tools & agentsSelected native tools and agent-building capabilities, not an exhaustive list.Tool use, agents, vision, coding workflows4–16 agents; functions, web/X, code, collections

How to choose

Compare the job, not the hype.

Start with the job you need to complete, then validate cost, access, and policy details on your exact provider route.

Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 requires 30-day retention unless Anthropic authorizes an exception. API data is not used for training without express permission.

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta

SpaceXAI says API inputs and outputs are not used for training without explicit permission. Requests are encrypted and retained for 30 days by default; team-level zero data retention is available with feature tradeoffs.

Frequently asked questions

Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta FAQ

What is the main difference between Claude Fable 5 and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta?

Claude Fable 5: The original Fable model for complex coding and multi-step work, retained for existing integrations. Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta: A specialist Grok model that sends several AI agents to investigate a difficult question in parallel, then combines their work into one researched answer.

Should I choose Claude Fable 5 or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta?

Consider Claude Fable 5 when your priority is Complex coding. Consider Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta when your priority is Deep research with several lines of inquiry. Test both with your own data and provider route before committing.

Is this Claude Fable 5 vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent Beta comparison based on Cody benchmarks?

No. This comparison aligns provider-published facts for the Text & reasoning category. It does not claim a universal winner or combine incompatible third-party benchmark scores.